[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:49:33 -0700
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
From the article Andrea cited:
<blockquote>
Given the relative infancy of digital rights management, it is premature to
consider any legislative change at this time," the report states.
</blockquote>
Yeah ... too bad they didn't take that stand _before_ passing the DMCA!
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrea.Foster@chronicle.com [mailto:Andrea.Foster@chronicle.com]
...
>
>
> Richard:
>
> I believe Pouliot is talking about a Copyright Office report,
> which the
> Chronicle of HIgher Education wrote about.
> See URL below. It also has link to actual report.
>
> http://chronicle.com/free/2001/08/2001083101t.htm
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
- Prev by Date:
RE: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- Next by Date:
Re: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- Previous by thread:
Re: [dvd-discuss] http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875 ,00.html
- Next by thread:
Re: [dvd-discuss]http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,28875,00.html
- Index(es):