[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [DMCA_discuss] Linux kernel security fixes censored by the DMCA
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: [DMCA_discuss] Linux kernel security fixes censored by the DMCA
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 02:09:47 +0200
- Cc: dmca_discuss(at)lists.microshaft.org
- In-Reply-To: <3BD74495.D06B6A94@ia.nsc.com>; from johnzu@ia.nsc.com on Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 04:45:41PM -0600
- References: <20011022141551.E61071@networkcommand.com> <3BD74495.D06B6A94@ia.nsc.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 04:45:41PM -0600, John Zulauf wrote:
> This of course brings me back to my initial worry.... just how are we
> supposed to get our jobs done without legal liability and risk of felony
> charges.
Very simple: Don't piss off the media mafia - the DMCA is a selective
law. It will be used against carefully selected targets. That means
against anyone its "sponsors" consider dangerous, but definitely never
against one of them.
--
-- http://web.lemuria.org
--