[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] encryption and limited time
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] encryption and limited time
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:24:37 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Or look at TWIKI at openlaw.
Eric Seppanen <eds@reric.net>
Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu
12/14/01 09:47 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: dvd-discuss@lweb.law.harvard.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] encryption and limited time
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 06:20:42PM +0100, Arise wrote:
> What about the argument that congress cannot copyright protect an
encrypted
> file if it does not mandate that an unencrypted file be released ones
the
> copyright term expires.
It's been discussed to death before. It's a solid argument, and only
one of many issues that demonstrates the contradictions inherent in the
DMCA.
If you're new to dvd-discuss, most of the legal issues with the DMCA's
anti-circumvention laws are covered in Robert S. Thau's excellent
"Authority of the Copyright Owner" paper available here:
http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/rst/dmca/auth/auth.html
Highly recommended for everyone on the list.
PS: Robert, you might want to look at the quoted paragraph in the "Abuse
of paracopyright" section. The paragraph is confusingly formatted, with
line numbers spread through the text. I think there's a <pre></pre>
missing.