[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Australian Court rules: Films aren't software
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Australian Court rules: Films aren't software
- From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger(at)samsara.law.cwru.edu>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:55:08 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:00:28 PST." <OF35B80228.4A5F7F82-ON88256B5A.005797D0@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
"Michael A Rolenz" writes:
: You'll get no argument from me....BTW. Your reference to the retina is
: even more apt. If my memory serves me, some experiments the cognitive
: psychologist did before 1978 (when I took cog.psych.) showed that the eye
: had a short duration memory distinct from the short term memory in the
: brain. OTOH....what I'm remembering is long term memory and that isn't
: always reliable.
In any event, the mapping on the retina does not correspond to
what we see after the brain processes the information collected
by the sensors of the retina.
--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
EMAIL: junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu
NOTE: junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu no longer exists