[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] DoS attack on RIAA webstie
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] DoS attack on RIAA webstie
- From: ronald(at)caprock-spur.com
- Date: Thu, Aug 1 2002 8:53:53 GMT-0500
- Cc:
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
>
>From: Jack Oskay <joskay@ix.netcom.com>
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:27:44 -0700
>To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>Subject: [dvd-discuss] DoS attack on RIAA webstie
>
>Hi
>A question on this. And please let me know if it was posted before. Sorry
>if this was asked before or seems redundant.
>I personally agree what the kid did was illegal and should receive what he
>got. But something about the way it was done bothers me.
>Did he mention about how he got the scrolling message about downloading is
>illegal? To do it after a download and then get the message could indicate
>a few things. One possibility is the site he went to was a site designed
>to mislead and then post the message. Another possibility was it was
>detected (by another site), then the files he download were corrupted and
>another site sent the message. Another possibility is the operating or
>application detected it and sent the message.
>The kid might of not mentioned it but if there are any details please let
>me know.
>Thank you
He said it was an AVI that was named the same as the movie. I don't know how long the file was. If he comes back in I'll ask, maybe I can get him to burn me a cd. ;-) I think they are trying to seed the P2P network with these fake files.
Ronald