[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] DMCA exemption reply comments now available
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] DMCA exemption reply comments now available
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:57:47 -0800
- In-reply-to: <20030227212003.GA22191@sethf.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I haven't had a chance to look at too many (network problems and 56k modem) but
it's amusing that some of the replys are blanket yet reply to no specifics .
Look at reply 29 from macrovision. comments are on 1-50 yet doesn't seem to
reference anything particular. (I'm looking for #14 in particular)..now didn't
the LOC ask for specifics and excluded a lot last time for that reason?
On 27 Feb 2003 at 16:20, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:20:03 -0500
From: Seth Finkelstein <sethf@sethf.com>
To: dmca_discuss@lists.microshaft.org, dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu,
dmca-activists@gnu.org, cyberia-l@listserv.aol.com
Subject: [dvd-discuss] DMCA exemption reply comments now available
Send reply to: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000204.html
>
> The Copyright Office has now posted all the reply comments concerning
> DMCA exemptions. The comments are available at:
>
> http://www.copyright.gov/1201/2003/reply/reply1.html
>
> This page contains reply comments submitted as a part of a
> rulemaking on exemptions from prohibition on circumvention of
> technological measures that control access to copyrighted works ...
>
> --
> Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer sethf@sethf.com http://sethf.com
> Anticensorware Investigations - http://sethf.com/anticensorware/
> Seth Finkelstein's Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/