[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] W32.Klez.H infection on of our group member's PC
- To: Openlaw DMCA Forum <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] W32.Klez.H infection on of our group member's PC
- From: Marcia Wilbur <aicra(at)well.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.52.0307031241530.20412@shaft.bitmine.net>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
***blatant self promotion***
For those Windows users interested in a unix-like
computer to experience the difference, please contact me and we can work
something out.
I can offer you:
Debian, Mandrake or (in some cases) Dead Rat.
-marcia
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Jeme A Brelin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > The news doesn't report on UNIX vulnerabilities because UNIX is not
> > popular. Go to www.cert.org and search on UNIX if you want to see
> > what's out there.
>
> I think the original poster was asking someone to justify the claim that
> there was an email-transmissable virus that could infect any Unix (or
> unix-like, presumably) system. I think Windows users don't understand how
> incredibly unlikely such a thing would be because of the binary
> incompatibility across hardware and software platforms, the permission
> structure, and the diversity of available application software and script
> interpreters.
>
> In other words, Unix (and unix-like) systems can contain vulnerabilities
> as can the applications run on those systems, but they are not the type of
> casual infections to which a Windows system is susceptible.
>
> J.
> --
> -----------------
> Jeme A Brelin
> jeme@brelin.net
> -----------------
> [cc] counter-copyright
> http://www.openlaw.org
>
>